<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WS-* vs. REST, XML Schema vs. Relax NG- quit complaining. They can&#8217;t hear you</title>
	<link>http://www.kstaken.com/archives/104_ws-vs-rest-xml-schema-vs-relax-ng-quit-complaining-they-cant-hear-you.html</link>
	<description>Kimbro Staken exploring creative use of technology and whatever else happens to seem interesting.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mokka mit Schlag &#187; REST Pessimists</title>
		<link>http://www.kstaken.com/archives/104_ws-vs-rest-xml-schema-vs-relax-ng-quit-complaining-they-cant-hear-you.html#comment-510</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 12:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kstaken.com/archives/104_ws-vs-rest-xml-schema-vs-relax-ng-quit-complaining-they-cant-hear-you.html#comment-510</guid>
					<description>[...] Several people have started to push back on the REST vs. WS-* and RELAX vs. W3C XSD and Rails vs. JEE fronts with a self-defeating argument. Well, of course, you&amp;#8217;re right they say; but it doesn&amp;#8217;t matter. The big vendors are selling these big, expensive complex solutions; and that&amp;#8217;s all the CIO hears; so that&amp;#8217;s all that matters. Sure, you can get the job done better/faster/cheaper with Rails/REST/RELAX, but you won&amp;#8217;t. Well, to these pessimists I have a one-word response: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Several people have started to push back on the REST vs. WS-* and RELAX vs. W3C XSD and Rails vs. JEE fronts with a self-defeating argument. Well, of course, you&#8217;re right they say; but it doesn&#8217;t matter. The big vendors are selling these big, expensive complex solutions; and that&#8217;s all the CIO hears; so that&#8217;s all that matters. Sure, you can get the job done better/faster/cheaper with Rails/REST/RELAX, but you won&#8217;t. Well, to these pessimists I have a one-word response: [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alastair Rankine</title>
		<link>http://www.kstaken.com/archives/104_ws-vs-rest-xml-schema-vs-relax-ng-quit-complaining-they-cant-hear-you.html#comment-509</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 11:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kstaken.com/archives/104_ws-vs-rest-xml-schema-vs-relax-ng-quit-complaining-they-cant-hear-you.html#comment-509</guid>
					<description>I don't know about you, but I take consolation in the fact that simplicity does tend to win out in the end though.

I notice that elegance (not merely simplicity) is in of Tim Bray's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/13/TPSM-Elegance&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Technology Predictor Success Matrix&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but I take consolation in the fact that simplicity does tend to win out in the end though.</p>
<p>I notice that elegance (not merely simplicity) is in of Tim Bray&#8217;s <a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/13/TPSM-Elegance" rel="nofollow">Technology Predictor Success Matrix</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
